(Cucurbita mixta)

Description

Resources

15 resources available. Click on the image to preview, click on the publisher link to download.

Downy mildew of cucumber

20157800695.jpg

Published at: plantwise.org

Aphid control in cabbage

20137804481.jpg

FACTSHEETS FOR FARMERS www.plantwise.org Created in Grenada , October 2012 Aphid control in cabbage Recognize the problem Cabbage aphids look like small lice on plants. They can reduce cabbage farmers' income by decreasing the quality and damaging up to 90% of their crop. Background Aphids are sucking insects that suck the juices from the leaves and tender shoots of plants. They can change the shape of the leaves causing the leaf to curl and can also spread diseases from plant to plant. There are different types of aphids but the usual type...

Published at: plantwise.org

Gummy stem blight of watermelon

20127802675.jpg

FACTSHEETS FOR FARMERS www.plantwise.org Created in Trinidad and Tobago , November 2011 Gummy stem blight of watermelon Recognize the problem Gummy stem blight is a major disease of watermelon. This disease often causes total crop loss. It is caused by a fungus. The leaves, stem and fruit may become infected. Brown leaf spots often start close to the edge of the leaves. The spots become larger, irregular and may join together and kill the leaf. Older leaves at the base of the plant turn yellow, become dry and fall off. The stem may split at the...

Published at: plantwise.org

Angular leaf spot in cucumber

20127802688.jpg

FACTSHEETS FOR FARMERS www.plantwise.org Created in Trinidad and Tobago , November 2011 Angular leaf spot in cucumber Recognize the problem Angular leaf spot is a common disease of cucumber, squash, pumpkin and watermelon. Affected plants bear less and the fruits are smaller. This disease causes water-soaked spots on leaves, stems and fruits. Leaf spots are not round but spread out to the leaf veins, so they look angular, or pointed. The spots on top of the leaves are grey to light brown, but spots under the leaves are usually shiny or gummy. The...

Published at: plantwise.org

Fall armyworm: The real pocket sized monster

20187800440.jpg

The REAL pocket-sized monster The fall ar mywor m is a new pest at tacking maize in Af r ica. The eggs and cater pillar are easiest to spot on the leaves and growing point of your maize. You can tell when a cater pillar is a fall ar mywor m by the 4 dots on its second to last segment and the upside down Y on its he\ ad. Its lifecycle includes eggs which hatch into cater pillars that grow to become pupae, f rom which a moth emerges. Each and every stage is bad for your maize. See it. Squash it. Stop it. Pupa Moth Eggs Caterpillar F a ll a rmyworm

Published at: plantwise.org

Viral diseases of cucurbits

949_viral_diseases.jpg

Published at: extension.cropsciences.illinois.edu

Plectosporium blight of cucurbits

946_cmplt.jpg

Published at: extension.cropsciences.illinois.edu

phu gummystemblight greenhousecucumberss

phu-gummystemblight-greenhousecucumberss.jpg

Gummy Stem Blight of Greenhouse Cucumber March, 2018 Gummy stem blight (GSB) is caused by the fungus Didymella bryoniae, previously known as Mycosphaerella melonis. The fungus is known to infect cucurbits, including cucumber, pumpkin, squash, watermelon, cantaloupe and many others. Under favourable climatic conditions, the pathogen can infect all parts, except roots, of the cucumber plant at all stages of plant development. Infection at fruit development often leads to internal fruit rot that may go unnoticed at harvest. This raises concern among growers because the...

Published at: www2.gov.bc.ca

squash leaffooted bug 165

squash_leaffooted_bug_165.jpg

Photo 1 . Lep to glo ssu s n ym phs f e ed in g o n w ild cu cu rb it . Photo 2 . L eaf-fo ote d b ug, Lep to glo ssu s s p ecie s, on s n ake g o urd . Photo 3 . L eaf-fo ote d b ug, Lep to glo ssu s s p ecie s, on t o m ato c le arly s h ow in g t h e " le af" o f t h e le g. Photo 4 . L eaf-fo ote d b ug, Lep to glo ssu s s p ecie s, on lu ffa . Photo 5 . L eaf-fo ote d b ug, Lep to glo ssu s s p ecie s, on f lo w er o f p um pkin w it h " le af" o f t h e le g cle arly s h ow in g. P acif ic P ests a n d P ath ogen s - F a ct S h eets P acif ic...

Published at: pestnet.org

FAW FACT SHEET

FAW_FACT_SHEET.jpg

LOSE LESS, FEED MORE Plantwise is a CABI -led global initiative. www.plantwise.org PEST MANAGEMENT DECISION GUIDE: GREEN AND YELLOW LIST Fall Armyworm. Spodoptera frugiperda Damage on the funnel by larvae (Photo: M. Kasina, KALRO, Kenya Y” pattern on head of Armyworm larva (Photo: desiree vanheerden Syngenta) Prevention Monitoring Direct Control Direct Control Restrictions  Plough deep to expose the pupae to predators and solar heat  Avoid late or off -season planting , plant early to avoid pest population build up...

Published at: kalro.org

Squash Bug and Squash Vine Borer: Organic Controls

Published at: attra.ncat.org

CA Watermelon final

CA_Watermelon_final.jpg

Watermelon plants produce separate male flowers, which make pollen, and female flowers which bear fruits. In order to set marketable fruit, bees need to transfer 500-1,000 pollen grains from male flowers to female flowers. Therefore, it’s important to consider pollination strategies that ensure consistent and reliable fruit set. Honey bees are the most important pollinators of commercial watermelon in California. However, some fields also receive pollination from wild bees like bumble bees and sweat bees. Like honey bees, these pollinators visit watermelon flowers to collect pollen and...

Published at: icpbees.org

PA Pumpkin Factsheet FINAL

PA-Pumpkin-Factsheet-FINAL.jpg

Pumpkins require cross-pollination. Bees are needed to move pollen from the plant’s male flowers to the female flowers. Individual flowers have a short pollination window; flowers are typically only open from dawn until noon. Therefore, it’s important to consider pollination strategies that ensure consistent fruit set. Managed honey bees are brought in for pollination, but in many fields, wild bees such as bumble bees and squash bees are the most common pollinators. Like honey bees, these pollinators visit pumpkin flowers to collect pollen and nectar. Pumpkins Require Pollination...

Published at: icpbees.org

PA Pumpkin Factsheet 7.31.17

PA-Pumpkin-Factsheet-7.31.17.jpg

Pumpkins need bees to move pollen from male flowers to female flowers to set fruit. Individual flowers have a short pollination window; flowers are typically only open from dawn until noon. Therefore, it’s important to consider pollination strategies that ensure consistent fruit set. Managed honey bees are brought in for pollination, but in many fields, wild bees such as bumble bees and squash bees are the most common pollinators. Like honey bees, these pollinators visit pumpkin flowers to collect pollen and nectar. Pumpkins Require Pollination Integrated Crop Pollination:...

Published at: icpbees.org

Deciding When to Treat for 12 Spot Beetles in Snap Beans/Cómo y Cuándo Controlar al Escarabajo de 12 Manchas en los Ejotes (vainitas, habichuelas)

em8906.jpg

1 Pest description and damage The western spotted cucumber beetle (Diabrotica undecimpunctata), commonly called the “12-spot beetle,” is an insect pest of snap beans, corn, squash, cucumbers, and other vegetable crops in the Willamette Valley. Adult 12-spot beetles: • Are yellowish green, ¼ inch long, and have 12 black spots on their wing covers (Figure 1). • Eat and damage leaves and pods of snap beans. Feeding beetles scar and deform the beans. 12-spot beetle larvae (known as southern corn root worms): • Are wormlike and white, except for the head and last abdominal...

Published at: catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu

Names

Cucurbita mixta in differrent languages.

Cucurbita
قرع (جنس)
Balqabaq
Kalabasa
কুমড়া
Carbassera
Cucurbita
Tykev
Græskar
Kürbisse
Banja
Cucurbita
Kukurbo
Cucurbita
Kõrvits (perekond)
Cucurbita
Kurpitsat
Kürbisen
Cucurbita
Cabaza
Buča
Banjowc
Tök (növénynemzetség)
Cucurbita
カボチャ属
Qabaq
Асқабақ
호박속
Ашкабак
Cucurbita
Moliūgas
Ķirbji
Ayohtli
Graskar
Gresskar
Dynia
Cucurbita
Kalawasa
Cucurbita
Buča
Bocor
Cucurbita
Tikva golica
Pumpasläktet
Kabak
Chi Bí
Karubasa
Kim-koe
南瓜屬
Carabassa
Pumpkins
Dynia
Cucurbita
Cucurbita
Cucurbita

Q&A

Description

P. hysterophorus is an erect, much-branched with vigorous growth habit, aromatic, annual (or a short-lived perennial), herbaceous plant with a deep taproot. The species reproduces by seed. In its neotropical range it grows to 30-90 cm in height (Lorenzi, 1982, Kissmann and Groth, 1992), but up to 1.5 m, or even 2.5 m, in exotic situations (Haseler, 1976, Navie et al., 1996). Shortly after germination the young plant forms a basal rosette of pale green, pubescent, strongly dissected, deeply lobed leaves, 8-20 cm in length and 4-8 cm in width. The rosette stage may persist for considerable periods during unfavourable conditions (such as water or cold stress). As the stem elongates, smaller, narrower and less dissected leaves are produced alternately on the pubescent, rigid, angular, longitudinally-grooved stem, which becomes woody with age. Both leaves and stems are covered with short, soft trichomes, of which four types have been recognized and are considered to be of taxonomic importance within the genus (Kohli and Rani, 1994).;Flower heads are both terminal and axillary, pedunculate and slightly hairy, being composed of many florets formed into small white capitula, 3-5 mm in diameter. Each head consists of five fertile ray florets (sometimes six, seven or eight) and about 40 male disc florets. The first capitulum forms in the terminal leaf axil, with subsequent capitula occurring progressively down the stem on lateral branches arising from the axils of the lower leaves. Thousands of inflorescences, forming in branched clusters, may be produced at the apex of the plant during the season. Seeds (achenes) are black, flattened, about 2 mm long, each with two thin, straw-coloured, spathulate appendages (sterile florets) at the apex which act as air sacs and aid dispersal.

Hosts

P. hysterophorus is known to reduce the yield of various crops and to compete with pasture species in various countries. However, the yield loss and specific effects on the crops have not been quantified in all countries (Rubaba et al., 2017).;In Australia, the main impact of P. hysterophorus has been in the pastoral region of Queensland, where it replaces forage plants, thereby reducing the carrying capacity for grazing animals (Haseler, 1976, Chippendale and Panetta, 1994). Serious encroachment and replacement of pasture grasses has also been reported in India (Jayachandra, 1971) and in Ethiopia (Tamado, 2001, Taye, 2002). The weed is also able to invade natural ecosystems, and has caused total habitat changes in native Australian grasslands and open woodlands (McFadyen, 1992).;In India, the yield losses are reported as up to 40% in several crops and a 90% reduction of forage production (Gnanavel, 2013). P. hysterophorus is now being reported from India as a serious problem in cotton, groundnuts, potatoes and sorghum, as well as in more traditional crops such as okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), brinjal (Solanum melongena), chickpea and sesame (Kohli and Rani, 1994), and is also proving to be problematic in a range of orchard crops, including vineyards, olives, cashew, coconut, guava, mango and papaya (Tripathi et al., 1991, Mahadevappa, 1997, Gnanavel, 2013).;Similar infestations of sugarcane and sunflower plantations have recently been noted in Australia (Parsons and Cuthbertson, 1992, Navie et al., 1996), whilst in Brazil and Kenya, the principal crop affected is coffee (Njoroge, 1989, Kissmann and Groth, 1992). In Ethiopia, parthenium weed was observed to grow in maize, sorghum, cotton, finger millet (Eleusine coracana), haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), tef (Eragrostis tef), vegetables (potato, tomato, onion, carrot) and fruit orchards (citrus, mango, papaya and banana) (Taye, 2002). In Pakistan, the weed has been reported from number of crops, including wheat, rice, sugarcane, sorghum, maize, squash, gourd and water melon (Shabbir 2006, Shabbir et al. 2011, Anwar et al. 2012).;In Mexico, the species is reported as a weed in cotton, rice, sugarcane, Citrus spp, beans, safflower, sunflower, lentils, corn, mango, okra, bananas, tomato, grapes, alfalfa, chili peppers, luffa, marigolds and other vegetables and fruit orchards. It is also a weed in nurseries. In Argentina is reported as a weed of tobacco fields (CONABIO, 2018).;Gnanavel (2013) also reports the following detrimental effects of P. hysterophorus on crops: it inhibits nitrogen fixing bacteria in legumes, the vast quantity of pollen it produces (ca. 624 million/plants) inhibits fruit setting, it is an alternative host for viruses that cause diseases in crop plants, and it is an alternative host for mealy bugs.

Biological Control
The use of insect and fungal pathogens and the exploitation of allelopathic plants is considered by Kaur et al. (2014) as the most economical and practical way to manage the infestations of the species. Biological control has been, and continues to be, considered the best long-term or sustainable solution to the parthenium weed problem in Australia (Haseler, 1976, McFadyen, 1992) and because of the vast areas and the socio-economics involved, this approach has also been proposed for India (Singh, 1997). South Africa was the first country in Africa to implement a biological control program against the species in 2003 (Rubaba et al., 2017). Four host-specific biocontrol agents have been released sequentially since 2010 after evaluation of their suitability, with variable establishment and spread (Strathie et al., 2016).;The use of insects as biocontrol agents had been tried in various countries (Kaur et al., 2014). Searches for, and evaluation of, coevolved natural enemies have been conducted in the neotropics since 1977. So far, nine insect species and two fungal pathogens have been introduced into Australia as classical biological control agents (Julien, 1992, McClay et al., 1995, Navie et al., 1996, Dhileepan and McFadyen, 1997, Evans, 1997a). Callander and Dhileepan (2016) report that most of these agents have become established and have proven effective in central Queensland, but that the weed is now spreading further into southern Queensland where the biocontrol agents are not present. Several of the agents are therefore now being redistributed into south and southeast Queensland.;The rust fungus, Puccinia abrupta var. partheniicola, is a prominent natural enemy in the semi-arid uplands of Mexico (Evans, 1987a, b), but since its release in Queensland in 1992, climatic conditions have been largely unfavourable (Evans, 1997a, b). It was accidentally introduced into Kenya (Evans, 1987a) and Ethiopia in mid-altitudes (1400-2500 masl) with disease incidence up to 100% in some locations (Taye et al., 2002a). Screening of another rust species (Puccinia melampodii) from Mexico was carried out (Evans, 1997b, Seier et al., 1997) and released in Australia in the summer of 1999/2000 (PAG, 2000). This fungus was later renamed Puccinia xanthii Schwein. var. parthenii-hysterophorae Seier, H.C.Evans & ç.Romero (Seier et al., 2009). Retief et al. (2013) report on specificity testing carried out in quarantine facilities in South Africa, and conclude that the fungus is suitable for release as a biological control agent of P. hysterophorus in South Africa. The authors suggest that this species has more potential for biocontrol in South Africa than Puccinia abrupta, which may have little impact in the low-altitude, high-temperature areas of the country where the weed is spreading.;In India, the mycoherbicide potential of plurivorous fungal pathogens belonging to the genera Fusarium, Colletotrichum, Curvularia,Myrothecium and Sclerotium, has and is being evaluated (Mishra et al., 1995, Evans, 1997a). Parthenium phyllody disease caused by the phytoplasma of faba bean phyllody group (FBP) was reported to reduce seed production by 85% (Taye et al., 2002b) and is being evaluated for use as a biological control agent in Ethiopia. Kaur and Aggarwal (2017) have tested an Alternaria isolate found on the weed, and report that it is worth investigating as a mycoherbicide for control of parthenium. Metabolites of Alternaria japonica and filtrates of Alternaria macrospora have caused significant damage to Parthenium (Kaur et al., 2015, Javaid et al., 2017).;Among the established insect biocontrol agents, the leaf-feeding beetle, Zygogramma bicolorata, the stem-galling moth, Epiblema strenuana, the stem-boring beetle, Listronotus setosipennis, and the seed-feeding weevil, Smicronyx lutulentus, are proving to be the most successful when climatic factors are favourable (McFadyen, 1992, Dhileepan and McFadyen, 1997, Evans, 1997a). Some control of parthenium weed has also been achieved in India with Z. bicolorata (Jayanth and Visalakshy, 1994, Singh, 1997, Sarkate and Pawar, 2006), although there has been controversy concerning its taxonomy and host specificity (Jayanth et al., 1993, Singh, 1997). Shabbir et al. (2016) reported that Z. bicolorata was most effective when applied in higher densities and at early growth stages of the weed. The distribution of this leaf beetle in South Asia was investigated by Dhileepan and Senaratne (2009), when it was present in many states in India, and in the Punjab region of Pakistan. Shrestha et al. (2011) reported that Z. bicolorata arrived in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal in August 2010, and that by September it had spread over half of the valley areas where P. hysterophorus was present, although damage to the weed was only appreciable at one site.;Z. bicolorata has been seen attacking sunflowers in India and the use of Epiblema strenuata has not been effective, as it was found affecting Guizotia abyssinica crops (Kaur et al., 2014). More recently, Z. bicolorata and L. setosipennis have been released in South Africa and S. lutulentus is being evaluated under quarantine. Before approval as a biocontrol agent in South Africa in 2013, extensive testing suggested that Z. bicolorata would not become a pest of sunflowers in the country (McConnachie, 2015).;The use of antagonistic, competitor plants, such as Cassia spp. and Tagetes spp., has been recommended to control and replace P. hysterophorus in India (Mahadevappa and Ramaiah, 1988, Evans, 1997a, Mahadevappa, 1997, Singh, 1997). In Australia, Bowen et al. (2007) tested a number of grass and legume species against the growth of parthenium weed plants and identified further species that could suppress weed growth. Recently, Khan et al. (2013) tested a number of native and introduced pasture species and identified several of them to be suppressive against parthenium weed in both glasshouse and field conditions. The sowing of selected pasture plants in infested areas can suppress the growth of parthenium weed by as much as 80% and also provide improved fodder for stock (Adkins et al., 2012). Shabbir et al. (2013) showed that the suppressive plants and biological control agents can act synergistically to significantly reduce both the biomass and seed production of parthenium weed under field conditions. The suppressive plants strategy is easy to apply, sustainable over time, profitable under a wide range of environmental conditions and promotes native plant biodiversity. Species reported as effectively outcompeting P. hysterophorus are Cassia sericea, C. tora, C. auriculata, Croton bonplandianum, Amaranthus spinosus, Tephrosia purpurea, Hyptis suaveolens, Sida spinosa, and Mirabilis jalapa. Extracts of Imperata cylindrica, Desmostachya bipinnata, Otcantium annulatum, Sorghum halepense Dicanthium annulatum, Cenchrus pennisetiformis, Azadirachta indica, Aegle marmelos and Eucalyptus tereticornis are reported as inhibiting the germination and/or growth of P. hysterophorus (Kaur et al., 2014).

Source: cabi.org