Potamogeton crispus

Formal aquatic plant surveys are generally necessary for the early detection of this species.
Similarities to Other Species/Conditions
Top of page
P. crispus is easily distinguished from other pondweeds by leaf and fruit morphology, phenological characteristics, and turion production (Iida et al., 2004). P. crispus is unique in that its leaf margins are finely serrate. Difficulties in identification may occur very early or late in the growing season, when turions are germinating. At these times, the plant develops a winter growth form with very slender, limp, blue-green leaves (Bolduan et al., 1994). Serrations are present in the winter growth form, though are not as conspicuous. However, members of the genus Potamogeton hybridize readily, and produce individuals with intermediate morphological characteristics (Kaplan and Fehrer, 2004).
Prevention and Control
Top of page
Due to the variable regulations around (de)registration of pesticides, your national list of registered pesticides or relevant authority should be consulted to determine which products are legally allowed for use in your country when considering chemical control. Pesticides should always be used in a lawful manner, consistent with the product's label.
Prevention
The vegetative propagules of this species are very easy to spread. Therefore, educational programs are usually necessary to decrease this form of human-mediated spread. Teaching users how to clean equipment in a way that decreases the chance of transmission is one way to lessen the impact of the human vector. Several of the USA states have legislated regulation of the purchase, transportation, and introduction of this species.
Rapid Response
This species produces turions prolifically, and because the turions can stay dormant yet viable for at least 2 years (Tomaino, 2004), rapid response to decrease turion deposition is integral to successful management.
Public Awareness
Numerous educational campaigns have been directed at informing the public about the danger of aquatic invasive species. Agencies in areas in which P. crispus is particularly problematic commonly distribute informational materials about its identity as well as how to report new invasions. Other educational campaigns have been directed towards informing the public about how to clean equipment in order to prevent the transportation and spread of invasive species.
Eradication
No reports of eradication exist in the literature.
Control
Cultural control and sanitary measures
Turions are easily transportable and can remain dormant for up to 2 years. Thus, it is extremely important to decrease the instances of accidental introduction by addressing humans as a vector. By establishing guidelines on how to properly clean equipment, dispose of water, and identify target plants, it is likely that instances of accidental transportation and release will be fewer.
Physical/mechanical control
Mechanical harvesting may be used to obtain some nuisance relief, but reviews of efficacy of control are mixed. In Michigan, USA the dominance of P. crispus was only reinforced by harvesting at the expense of natives (Bolduan et al., 1994), whereas it has been shown elsewhere that early season cutting at the sediment surface prevented turion production (ISSG, 2006). Some have used winter drawdowns as a means of control, but the literature reports no significant impact of overwinter drawdown on P. crispus (Nichols and Shaw, 1986). Shallow dredging also has mixed reviews, at times there seems to be little effect, and in some cases lasting control has been achieved (Tobiessen and Snow, 1984;Tomaino, 2004).Other mechanical methods including benthic barriers, hand removal, rotovation and shading have been reported as successful (USACE, 2002).
Movement control
Screening has been used to stop the movement of turions. However, because plants can spread via fragments, much attention has been given to decreasing human-mediated dispersal. The plant is on a number of state noxious lists. Some states have put in place legislation to regulate the sale, transportation and introduction of P. crispus.
Chemical control
P. crispus is sensitive to 2,4-D, especially during early spring (Wolf and Madsen, 2003;Belgers et al., 2007). P. crispus is susceptible to endothall-based herbicides (Skogerboe and Getsinger, 2002). It is also suggested that treatments occur in early spring in order to lessen the impacts on the native plant community (ISSG, 2006). The herbicides fluridone and diquat have also been used and in general, chemical treatments provide relief for one growing season (ISSG, 2006).