HOW TO STORE WHEAT ON-FARM | HYGIENE | GRAIN PROTECTANTS AND FUMIGANTS | AERATION DURING STORAGE | MONITORING WHEAT NOR THERN SECTION 13 STORAGE FEBRUARY 2016 WHEAT
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 13 WheAT - Storage 1 Feedback Table of Contents SECTION 13 Storage An on-farm storage system designed for good hygiene that includes aerati\ on and sealable silos for fumigation is essential for growers who wish to maximise their returns from wheat. Without sealable silos, growers could be contributing to Australia’s problem of insect resistance to phosphine, the most common fumigant used in the Australian grain industry. Without aeration, growers risk excluding themselves from markets that will not accept chemically treated grain. In conjunction with sound management practices, which include checking grain temperatures and regular monitoring for insect infestations, an on-farm storage system that is well designed and maintained and properly operated provides the best insurance a grower can have on the quality of grain to be out-turned. Figure 1: Storage with aeration is important for protecting Australia’s markets. (Photo: QDAFF) Grain Trade Australia (GTA) stipulates standards for heat-damaged, bin-burnt, storage- mould-affected or rotten wheat, all of which can result in the discounting or rejection of grain. GTA has nil tolerance to live, stored grain insects for all grades of wheat from premium milling grades to feed. 1 Effective management of stored grain can eliminate all of these risks to wheat quality. In grain storages in Queensland, including central Queensland, and New South Wales, target grain temperatures of stored wheat should be 20–23°C during summer and less 1 Grain Trade Australia (2013) Wheat Standards, 2013/2014 season. GTA, August 2013. 13
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 13 WheAT - Storage 2 Feedback Table of Contents than 15°C in winter. 2 In northern NSW and southern Queensland, including the Darling Downs, aerated silos properly managed, should allow growers to target an average summer time grain storage temperature of 20°C. 13.1 how to store wheat on-farm According to the Kondinin Group National Agricultural Survey 2011, silos account for 79% of Australia’s on-farm grain storage, compared with 12% for bunkers and pits and 9% for grain bags. Aerated silos that can be sealed during fumigation are widely acknowledged as the most effective ways to store wheat on-farm (Table 1). There is now an Australian standard (AS2628) for sealable silos that manufacturers in Australia can choose to use as a construction standard to ensure reliable fumigation results. Table 1: Advantages and disadvantages of grain storage options Storage type Advantages Disadvantages Gas-tight sealable silo • Gas-tight sealable status allows phosphine and controlled atmosphere options to control insects • Easily aerated with fans • Fabricated on-site or off-site and transported • Capacity from 15 tonnes up to 3000 tonnes • Up to 25 year plus service life • Simple in-loading and out-loading • Easily administered hygiene (cone base particularly) • Can be used multiple times in-season • Requires foundation to be constructed • Relatively high initial investment required • Seals must be regularly maintained • Access requires safety equipment and infrastructure • Requires an annual test to check gas-tight sealing Non-sealed silo • Easily aerated with fans • 7–10% cheaper than sealed silos • Capacity from 15 tonnes up to 3000 tonnes • Up to 25 year plus service life • Can be used multiple times in-season • Requires foundation to be constructed • Silo cannot be used for fumigation —see phosphine label • Insect control options limited to protectants in eastern states and dryacide in WA. • Access requires safety equipment and infrastructure Grain storage bags • Low initial cost • Can be laid on a prepared pad in the paddock • Provide harvest logistics support • Can provide segregation options • Are all ground operated • Can accommodate high-yielding seasons • Requires purchase or lease of loader and unloader • Increased risk of damage beyond short-term storage (typically three months) • Limited insect control options, fumigation only possible under specific protocols • Requires regular inspection and maintenance which needs to be budgeted for • Aeration of grain in bags currently limited to research trials only • Must be fenced off • Prone to attack by mice, birds, foxes etc. • Limited wet weather access if stored in paddock • Need to dispose of bag after use • Single-use only Grain storage sheds • Can be used for dual purposes • 30 year plus service life • Low cost per stored tonne • Aeration systems require specific design • Risk of contamination from dual purpose use • Difficult to seal for fumigation • Vermin control is difficult • Limited insect control options without sealing • Difficult to unload Growers should pressure-test sealable silos once a year to check for damaged seals on openings. Storages must be able to be sealed properly to ensure high phosphine gas concentrations are held long enough to give an effective fumigation. 2 P Burrill (2013) Grain Storage Future pest control options and storage systems 2013–2014., GRDC Update, July 2013. Video Watch this GRDC Ground Cover TV clip to find out more: http://www. youtube.com/ watch?v=iS3tUbJZl6U 13
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 13 WheAT - Storage 3 Feedback Table of Contents At an industry level, it is in growers’ best interests to only fumigate in gas-tight sealable storages to help stem the rise of insect resistance to phosphine. This resistance has come about because of the prevalence of storages that are poorly sealed or unsealed during fumigation. 3 The Kondinin Group National Agricultural Survey 2009 revealed that 85% of respondents had used phosphine at least once during the previous 5 years, and of those users, 37% used phosphine every year for the past 5 years. A GRDC survey during 2010 revealed that only 36% of growers using phosphine applied it correctly—in a gas-tight, sealable silo. Research shows that fumigating in a storage that is not gas-tight does not ach\ ieve a sufficient concentration of fumigant for long enough to kill pests at all life-cycle stages. For effective phosphine fumigation, a minimum gas concentration of 300 parts per million (ppm) for 7 days or 200 ppm for 10 days is required. (Figure 2). Fumigation trials in silos with small leaks demonstrated that phosphine levels are as low as 3 ppm close to the leaks. (Figure 3). The rest of the silo also suffers from reduced gas levels. 4 Figure 2: 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 01234 5678910 Gas concentration (ppm) Days under fumigation To p Middle Bottom (3.5 minute half-life pressure test) Gas concentration in gas-tight silo. (Source: QDAFF) Figure 3: 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 01234 5678910 Gas concentration (ppm) Days under fumigation To p Middle Bottom (8 second half-life pressure test) Gas concentration in a non-gas-tight silo. (Source: QDAFF) To find out more about how to pressure-test silos, visit ‘Fumigating with phosphine, other fumigants and controlled atmospheres’ at: http://www.grdc.com.au/~/media/ FC440FBD7AE14140A08DAA3F2962E501.pdf Aeration of stored wheat is the key non-chemical tool used to minimise the risk of insec\ t infestations and spoiling through heat and/or moisture damage. 3 C Warrick (2011) Fumigating with phosphine, other fumigants and controlled atmospheres: Do it right—do it once: A Grains Industry Guide. GRDC Stored Grain Project, January 2011 (reprinted June 2013). 4 P Botta, P Burrill, C Newman (2010) Pressure testing sealable silos. GRDC Grain Storage Fact Sheet, September 2010. GRDC Grain Storage Facilities: Planning for efficiency and quality. A Grains Industry Guide http://www. grdc.com.au/~/ media/5F5E5727E4C0 4BD48BC3DAA5A30 15786.pdf i More information 13
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 13 WheAT - Storage 4 Feedback Table of Contents Aeration controllers that automatically monitor air temperature and humidity are designed to turn fans on and off at the optimum times. The controller reduces the risk of having fans running on storages at times that may potentially cause g\ rain damage. Most aeration controllers have hour meters fitted, so run-times can be checked to ensure they are within range of the expected total average hours per month, for example, 100 hrs/month. It is important to separate aeration systems commonly used for “aeration cooling” and aeration systems designed specifically to achieve reliable “aeration drying”. Serious grain damage has occurred when fan performance has not met the required airflow rates as measured in litres per second per tonne (L/s.t). If aeration drying of grain is attempted with elevated moisture levels using an inadequate airflow rate and/or a poor system design, sections of the storage can develop very high moisture and grain temperatures. With low airflow rates moisture drying fronts move too slowly to prevent grain spoilage. Grain-quality losses from moulds and heat occur rapidly. This type of damage often makes the grain difficult to sell and may cause physical damage to the silo itself. 5 Researchers in Australia have developed a device that measures working airflow rates of fans fitted to grain storage. Called the ‘A-Flow’, it has been validated under controlled conditions, using an Australian Standard fan-performance test rig, to be within 2.6% of the true fan output. The device was used on a typical grain storage that was in the process of aerating recently harvested grain. A fan advertised to provide 1000 L/s (equivalent to 6.7L/s.t on a full 150-t silo) was tested and shown to be producing only 1.8 L/s.t. Because of this test, the farmer recognised a need to make changes to his current aeration system design. A number of changes may be required if airflow rates are not suitable for efficient aeration cooling or drying. A new fan that is better suited to the task could be installed, or the amount of grain in the silo reduced to increase flow rate per tonne of grain. Detailed information about selecting, siting and fitting-out silos, g rain storage bags, sheds and bunkers is contained in the GRDC Grains Industry Guide ‘Gra\ in storage facilities: Planning for efficiency and quality’. 13.2 hygiene Effective grain hygiene and aeration cooling can overcome 75% of pest problems in stored grain. All grain residues should be cleaned out when silos and grain-handling equipment are not in use to help minimise the establishment and build-up of pest populations. In one year, a bag of infested grain can produce more than one million insects, which can walk and fly to other grain storages where they will start new infestations. Meticulous grain hygiene involves removing any grain residues that can harbour pests and allow them to breed. Grain pests live in protected, sheltered areas in grain handling equipment and storage and breed best in warm conditions. Insect will also breed in outside dumps of unwanted grain. Try to bury grain or spread out unwanted grain to a shallow depth of less than 20 mm so insect are exposed to the daily temperature extremes and other insect predators. 5 P Burrill, A Ridley (2012) Performance testing aeration systems. GRDC Resear ch Update Northern Region, Spring 2012, Issue 66. A GRDC Fact Sheet explaining how to build and use an A-Flow is available at: http://www.grdc. com.au/Resources/ Factsheets/2012/08/ Grain-Storage- Performance-testing- aeration-systems i More information http://storedgrain. com.au/wp-content/ uploads/2013/07/ GRDC-GS-FACILITIES- Booklet-2013_Final.pdf i More information 13
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 13 WheAT - Storage 5 Feedback Table of Contents Figure 4: Poor grain hygiene undermines effective stored grain insect control. (Photo: QDAFF) A trial in Queensland revealed more than 1000 lesser grain borers ( Rhyzopertha dominica ) (Figure 4) in the first 40 L of grain through a harvester at the start of harvest; this harvester was considered reasonably clean at the end of the previous season. 6 Further studies in Queensland revealed that insects are least mobile during the colder winter months of the year. Cleaning around silos in the winter months before spring, this can reduce insect numbers before they become mobile. 6 P Burrill, P Botta, C Newman, B White, C Warrick (2013) Northern and southern regions—Grain storage pest control guide. GRDC Grain Storage Fact Sheet, June 2013. 13
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 13 WheAT - Storage 6 Feedback Table of Contents Figure 5: Ryzopertha dominica. (Photo: QDAFF) Successful grain hygiene involves cleaning all areas where grain residues becomes trapped in storages and equipment. Grain pests can survive in a tiny amount of grain, which can go on to infest freshly harvest clean grain. Harvesters and grain-handling equipment should be cleaned out thoroughly with compressed air after use. After grain storages and handling equipment are cleaned, they should be treated with a structural treatment. Diatomaceous earth (DE) is an amorphous silica also commonly \ known as the commercial products ‘Dryacide’™ and is widely used for this purpose. It acts by absorbing the insect’s cuticle or protective waxy exterior, causing death by desiccation. If applied correctly with good coverage in a dry environment, DE can provide up to 12 months’ protection by killing most species of grain insects and with no known risk of resistance. It can be applied as a dry dust or slurry spray. While many cereal grains buyers accept approved chemical insecticide structural treatments to storages, growers should avoid using them, or wash the storage out, before storing oilseeds and pulses. As there are now a number of export and domestic markets that require “pesticide residue free” grain (PRF), growers are advised to check with potential grain buyer’s before using grain protectants or structural treatments. To find out more about what to use and when and how to clean equipment and storages to minimise the chance of insect infestation, visit www.grdc.com.au/GRDC- FS-HygieneStructuralTreatments to download the GRDC’s Grain Storage Fact Sheet ‘Hygiene and structural treatment for grain storages’ (June 2013). 13.3 Grain protectants and fumigants Grain Trade Australia is aware of cases where various chemicals have been used to treat stored grain that are not approved for grain or that particular grain type. When they are detected, an entire shipload can be rejected, often with serious long-term consequences for important Australian grain markets. Markets that require PRF (‘pesticide residue free’) grain, do not rule out the use of some fumigants, including phosphine. However, PRF grain should not have any chemical residues from treatments that are applied directly to the grain as grain protectants. Before using a grain protectant or fumigant, growers need to check with prospective buyers, as the use of some chemical may exclude grain from certain markets. 13
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 13 WheAT - Storage 7 Feedback Table of Contents Although phosphine has resistance issues, it is widely accepted as having no residue issues. The grain industry has adopted a voluntary strategy to manage th\ e build-up of phosphine resistance in pests. Its core recommendations are to limit the number of conventional phosphine fumigations on undisturbed grain to three per year, and to employ a break strategy. The break is provided by moving the grain to eliminate pockets where the fumigant may fail to penetrate, and by retreating it with an alternative disinfestant or protectant. 7 Figure 6: Phosphine is widely accepted as having no residue issues. (Photo: QDAFF) Monitoring of stored-grain insects across Australia reveals that the number of populations with insects highly resistant to the fumigant phosphine has increased from about 5% in 2010 to 10% in 2015. 8 The development of phosphine resistance in stored-grain insects has, for the most part, been blamed on imperfect fumigation practices that allow survivors or carriers of resistance genes to survive and reproduce. This makes each incidence of resistance the likely result of practices at a particular location, be it on-farm or a receival site, or possibly the transport of insects in grain between the two. However, one of the major conclusions to come from ecological studies of several stored- grain insects is that natural gene flow is also a likely contributor – as it is for so many other agricultural pest threats. Gene flow is the transfer of hereditary traits from one population to another through interbreeding. 9 Recent research has identified the genes responsible for insect resistance to phosphine. A genetic analysis of insect samples collected from south-eastern Queensland between 2006 and 2011 has allowed researchers to confirm the increasing incidence of phosphine resistance in the region. Whereas few resistance markers were found in insects collected 7 P Collins (2009) Strategy to manage resistance to phosphine in the Australian grain industry. Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity Technical Report. 8 Phosphine resistance one in ten: http://www.grdc.com.au/Media-Centre/Ground-Cover-Supplements/ Ground-Cover-Issue-119--Grain-storage/Phosphine-resistance-one-in-ten 9 Travelling insects help resistance spread: http://www.grdc.com.au/Media-Centre/Ground-Cover- Supplements/Ground-Cover-Issue-119--Grain-storage/Travelling-insects-help-resistance-spread 13
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 13 WheAT - Storage 8 Feedback Table of Contents in 2006, by in 2011 most collections had insects that carried the resistance gene. Further testing with DNA markers that can detect phosphine resistance is expected to identify problem insects before resistance becomes entrenched, and thereby help to prolong phosphine’s effective life, as well as increasing the usefulness of the break strategy. 10 Table 2: Resistance and efficacy guide for stored grain insects (northern and southern regions) in cereal grains Treatments WhP (days) Lesser grain borer(Rhyzopertha dominica) Rust-red flour beetle(Tribolium castaneum) Rice weevil(Sitophilus oryzae) Saw-toothed grain beetle (Oryzaephilus surinamensis) Flat grain beetle(Cryptolestes ferrugineus) Psocids (booklice)(Order Psocoptera) Structural treatments Grain disinfectants - used on infested grain to control full life cycle (adults, eggs, larvae, pupae). Phosphine (eg Fumitoxin ®)1,3 when used in gas-tight, sealable stores 2 Sulfuryl fluoride (eg ProFume ®)10 1 Dichlorvos (eg Dichlorvos 1140 ®)11 7-28 9 Grain protectants – applied post harvest. Poor adult control if applied to infested grain. Pirimiphos-methyl (eg Actellic 900 ®) nil2 Fenitrothion (eg Fenitrothion 1000 ®)4 1-90 Chlorpyrifos-methyl (eg reldan Grain Protector ®)5 nil2 Methoprene (Grain Star 50 ®) nil6 7 7 ‘Combined products’ (eg Reldan Plus IGR Grain Protector) nil2 Deltamethrin (eg K-Obiol ®)10 nil2 Diatomaceous earth, amorphous silica – effective internal structural treatment for storages and equipment. Specific use grain treatments. Diatomaceous earth, amorphous silica (eg Dryacide ®)8 nil2 WHP Withholding Period Not registered for this pest High-level resistance in flat grain beetle has been identified, send insects for testing if fumigation failures occur Resistant species likely to survive this structural treatment for storage and equipment Resistance widespread (unlikely to be effective) Effective control1 unlikely to be effective in unsealed sites, causing resistance, see label for definitions 2 When used as directed on label 3 Total of (exposure + ventilation + withholding) = 10 to 27 days 4 Nufarm label only 5 Stored grains except malting barley and rice/ stored lupins registration for Victoria only/ not on stored maize destined for export 6 When applied as directed, do not move treated grain for 24 hours 7 Periods of 6–9 months storage including mixture in adulticide, eg Fenitrothion at label rate 8 Do not use on stored maize destined for export, or on grain delivered to bulk-handling authorities 9 Dichlorvos 500g/L registration only 10 Restricted to licensed fumigators or approved users 11 Restriced to use under permit 14075 only. Unlikely to be practical for use on farm Source: Registration information courtesy of Pestgenie, APVMA and InfoPest (DEEDI) websites 10 D Schlipalius (2013) Genetic clue to thwart phosphine resistance. GRDC Ground Cover, Issue 102, Jan.– Feb. 2013. 13
A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 13 WheAT - Storage 9 Feedback Table of Contents According to research results from scientists at Queensland’s Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (QDAFF), sulfuryl fluoride (SF) has excellent potential as an alternative fumigant to control phosphine-resistant grain storage pests (Table 2). It is currently registered in Australia as a grain disinfestant. Supplied under the trade name ‘ProFume’, SF can only be used by a licensed fumigator. Field trials have shown that SF can control strong phosphine-resistant populations of Rusty grain beetle (Cryptolestes ferrugineus ). Monthly sampling of fumigated grain has revealed no live insects for three consecutive months in large-scale bunker (pad) storages after the fumigation. Annual resistance-monitoring data was analysed to assess the impact of using SF \ as an alternative fumigant to phosphine. This revealed that after the introduction of SF in central storages across the northern and southern grain regions in 2010, there was a 50% reduction in the incidence of strongly phosphine-resistant populations of rusty grain beetle at the end of the first year, and the downward trend is continuing. Complimentary laboratory experiments have shown that phosphine resistance does not show cross-resistance to SF, which is an additional advantage of using SF. 11 Effective phosphine fumigation can be achieved by placing the chemical at the rate directed on the label onto a tray and hanging it in the top of a pressure-tested, sealable silo. A ground-level application system is also an efficient application method and these can be combined with a silo recirculation system on larger silos to improve the speed of gas distribution. After fumigation, grain should be ventilated for a minimum of 1 day with aeration fans running, or 5 days if no fans are fitted. A minimum withholding period of 2 days is required after ventilation before grain can be used for human consumption or stock-feed. The total time required for fumigating ranges from 7 to 20 days depending on grain temperature and the storage structure. To find out more, visit ‘Fumigating with phosphine, other fumigants and controlled atmospheres: Do it right—do it once: A Grains Industry Guide’: http://www.grdc.com. au/~/media/FC440FBD7AE14140A08DAA3F2962E501.pdf Two new grain protectants have become available in recently are now available. These include: • K-Obiol (active ingredients deltamethrin 50 g/L, piperonyl butoxide 400 g/L): Features acceptable efficacy against the common storage pest lesser grain borer, which has developed widespread resistance to current insecticides. Insect resistance surveys in the past consistently detected low levels of deltamethrin- resistant insect strains in the industry. This is a warning that resistant populations could increase quickly with widespread excessive use of one product. A ‘product stewardship’ program has been developed to ensure correct use of the product. 12 • Conserve On-Farm: Has three active ingredients (chlorpyrifos-methyl 550 g/L, S-methoprene 30 g/L, spinosad 120 g/L) to control most major insect pests of stored grain, including the resistant lesser grain borer. The MRLs have been established with key trading partners and there are no issues with meat residue bioaccumulation. A grain disinfestant combined with carbon dioxide gas, currently has some limitations. • VAPORMATE (active ingredient ethyl formate 166.7 g/kg): Approved for use in stored cereals and oilseeds. It is registered to control all life-stages of the major storage pest insects: lesser grain borer, rust-red flour beetle ( Tribolium spp.), Sawtoothed beetle, Flat grain beetles, storage moths and psocids (booklice). However does not fully control all stages of rice weevil. It must only be used by a licensed fumigator. 11 M Nayak (2012) Sulfuryl fluoride—A solution to phosphine resistance? GRDC Research Update Northern Region, Spring 2012, Issue 66. 12 P Burrill (2013) Grain Storage Future pest control options and storage systems 2013–2014. GRDC Update, July 2013. 13
